2009 Norwood Street Maintenance Program Summary
Prepared by Steve Thornbury, Council representative and member of the Streets and Infrastructure Committee member based on the “Street Survey” document provided at the June 10, 2009 meeting of the Streets and Infrastructure Committee.
Note:
Numbers in parenthesis (1.) indicate the “rating” assigned to each street based on its condition.
1. Excellent
2. Good
3. Fair
4. Poor
5. Critical
Section 1.
Streets receiving just “Polyfil”/“Hot Pour” – Crack and joint sealing
Ward 2.
· Hudson (1.5/2) – From Montgomery to Floral
Section 2.
Streets receiving both:
“Partial depth repair “ – Patching of bad spots
and
“Polyfil”/“Hot Pour” – Crack and joint sealing
Ward 1
· Carter (2.) – From Williams to Sherman
· Weyer (2.) – From Ivanhoe to dead-end
· Courtland (2.) – From Montgomery to dead-end
· Ridgeway (2.) – From Elm to dead-end
· Maple (2.) – From Smith to dead-end (entire length of Maple)
· Elm (2.) – From Smith to Allison (entire length of Elm)
· Harper (2.5) – From Wesley to Linden (entire length of Harper)
· Norwood (2.5) – From Beech to Ash
· Moundview (3) – Indian Mound to Indian Mound (entire length of Moundview)
Ward 2.
· Forest (2.) – From Williams to Smith
· Madison (2.) – From Lafayette to Williams
· South Madison (3.) – From Williams to Duck Creek
· Grove (2.) – From Williams to Forest
· Floral (2.) – From Smith to Elsmere
· Lafayette (2.) – From Smith to Monroe
· Ashland – From Monroe to Smith (3.)/ Montgomery to Monroe (4.)
· Cleaney – From Spencer to Montgomery (1.5) /Montgomery to Corporation Line (2.5)
Ward 3.
· Roseland (2.) – From Sheridan to dead-end
· Beech (2.) – From Norwood to Harris
· Harris (2.) – From Oak to Forest
· Kenilworth (2.) – From Smith to Beech
Ward 4.
· Glenside (2.) – From Homer to Fenwick
· Alvina (1.) – From Glenside to Lysle
· Pemberton (1.) – From Lysle to Glenside
· Moeller (1.) – From Montgomery to Quatman
· Fenwick (1.) – From Montgomery to Quatmen
· Irving Place (1.) – From Montgomery to dead-end
· Laura Lane (1.) – From Irving Place to dead-end
· Homer (1.) – From Lysle to Quatman
· Warren (2.) – From Ross to dead-end past Dale
· Hannaford (2.) – Form Fenwick to Carthage
· Quatman (2.) – From Carthage to Fenwick
· Section (4.5) – From Ross to Foraker
Section 3.
Streets receiving full “pavement planing” and resurfacing
Ward 1.
· Allison (3.5) – From Hopkins to Sherman
· Carter (4.) – From Sherman to dead-end
· Ivanhoe (4.5) – From Montgomery to Mills (For some reason the chart does not indicate “planing” for the section of Ivanhoe from Williams to Mills but, like the remaining stretches, does have dollars put toward “2 course micro” and “SAMI” repaving materials)
Ward 3.
· Forest (5.) – From Norwood Ave. up to the concrete that goes under the train tracks
There is also a “contingency” amount of $8250 included in the event they get into some of the patching and determine the base underneath more fundamental repair.
Note:
Numbers in parenthesis (1.) indicate the “rating” assigned to each street based on its condition.
1. Excellent
2. Good
3. Fair
4. Poor
5. Critical
Section 1.
Streets receiving just “Polyfil”/“Hot Pour” – Crack and joint sealing
Ward 2.
· Hudson (1.5/2) – From Montgomery to Floral
Section 2.
Streets receiving both:
“Partial depth repair “ – Patching of bad spots
and
“Polyfil”/“Hot Pour” – Crack and joint sealing
Ward 1
· Carter (2.) – From Williams to Sherman
· Weyer (2.) – From Ivanhoe to dead-end
· Courtland (2.) – From Montgomery to dead-end
· Ridgeway (2.) – From Elm to dead-end
· Maple (2.) – From Smith to dead-end (entire length of Maple)
· Elm (2.) – From Smith to Allison (entire length of Elm)
· Harper (2.5) – From Wesley to Linden (entire length of Harper)
· Norwood (2.5) – From Beech to Ash
· Moundview (3) – Indian Mound to Indian Mound (entire length of Moundview)
Ward 2.
· Forest (2.) – From Williams to Smith
· Madison (2.) – From Lafayette to Williams
· South Madison (3.) – From Williams to Duck Creek
· Grove (2.) – From Williams to Forest
· Floral (2.) – From Smith to Elsmere
· Lafayette (2.) – From Smith to Monroe
· Ashland – From Monroe to Smith (3.)/ Montgomery to Monroe (4.)
· Cleaney – From Spencer to Montgomery (1.5) /Montgomery to Corporation Line (2.5)
Ward 3.
· Roseland (2.) – From Sheridan to dead-end
· Beech (2.) – From Norwood to Harris
· Harris (2.) – From Oak to Forest
· Kenilworth (2.) – From Smith to Beech
Ward 4.
· Glenside (2.) – From Homer to Fenwick
· Alvina (1.) – From Glenside to Lysle
· Pemberton (1.) – From Lysle to Glenside
· Moeller (1.) – From Montgomery to Quatman
· Fenwick (1.) – From Montgomery to Quatmen
· Irving Place (1.) – From Montgomery to dead-end
· Laura Lane (1.) – From Irving Place to dead-end
· Homer (1.) – From Lysle to Quatman
· Warren (2.) – From Ross to dead-end past Dale
· Hannaford (2.) – Form Fenwick to Carthage
· Quatman (2.) – From Carthage to Fenwick
· Section (4.5) – From Ross to Foraker
Section 3.
Streets receiving full “pavement planing” and resurfacing
Ward 1.
· Allison (3.5) – From Hopkins to Sherman
· Carter (4.) – From Sherman to dead-end
· Ivanhoe (4.5) – From Montgomery to Mills (For some reason the chart does not indicate “planing” for the section of Ivanhoe from Williams to Mills but, like the remaining stretches, does have dollars put toward “2 course micro” and “SAMI” repaving materials)
Ward 3.
· Forest (5.) – From Norwood Ave. up to the concrete that goes under the train tracks
There is also a “contingency” amount of $8250 included in the event they get into some of the patching and determine the base underneath more fundamental repair.
0 Comments:
<< Home